Shield) hinein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required rein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met rein forward facing CRSs with restraining https://writeablog.net/bowlshock9/a-review-of-federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standard-seat-belt-webbing